解析:郭崇興解析2010年考研英語視頻 徐綻解析2010年考研英語視頻
2010考研閱讀text2-text3題源分析及參考答案
北京新東方學(xué)校 周雷
Text 2
A Pending Threat to Patents
by Michael Orey
Business Week February 21, 2008
Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon.com (AMZN) received one for its "one-click" online payment system. Merrill Lynch (MER) got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box。
Now the nation's top patent court appears poised to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago (第二十六題 D答案對 the controversy over authorization). In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Feb. 15 said it would use a case pending before it to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known, is "a very big deal," says Dennis D. Crouch, a patent professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. It "has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents. (第二十七題 D答案對 it may change the legal practice in US)"
Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face (第二十八題 C答案對,change of the attitude,因為后面說聯(lián)邦巡回法庭以前是很支持商業(yè)模式上的專利的,但是現(xiàn)在可能完全不支持了), because it was the Federal Circuit itself that ushered in such patents with its 1998 decision in the so-called State Street Bank (STT) case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by nascent Internet companies trying to stake out exclusive rights to specific types of online transactions. Later, more established companies raced to add such patents to their portfolios, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch. In 2005, IBM (IBM) noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents, despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some Wall Street investment firms armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice。
The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal Circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court's judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to uate is whether it should "reconsider" its State Street Bank ruling。
The Federal Circuit's action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example, the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for "inventions" that are obvious. (第二十九題B答案對are often unnecessarily issued,F(xiàn)在美國最高法院已經(jīng)收緊了頒發(fā)專利的范圍,那么聯(lián)邦巡回法庭也會收緊對商業(yè)模式的專利的審核)The judges on the Federal Circuit are "reacting to the anti-patent trend at the Supreme Court," says Harold C. Wegner, a patent attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School。
縱觀全文,最后一個題目第三十題,作為主旨題,答案應(yīng)該是 A looming threat to business-method patents
26. Business-method patents have recently aroused concern because of
[A] their limited value to business
[B] their connection with asset allocation
[C] the possible restriction on their granting
[D] the controversy over authorization
· | 2022考研復(fù)試聯(lián)系導(dǎo)師有哪些注意事 | 04-28 |
· | 2022考研復(fù)試面試常見問題 | 04-28 |
· | 2022年考研復(fù)試面試回答提問方法有 | 04-28 |
· | 2022考研復(fù)試怎么緩解緩解焦慮心態(tài) | 04-27 |
· | 2022年考研復(fù)試的訣竅介紹 | 04-27 |
· | 2022年考研復(fù)試英語如何準備 | 04-26 |
· | 2022年考研復(fù)試英語口語常見句式 | 04-26 |
· | 2022年考研復(fù)試的四個細節(jié) | 04-26 |
· | 2022考研復(fù)試準備:與導(dǎo)師及時交流 | 04-26 |
· | 2022考研復(fù)試面試的綜合技巧 | 04-26 |