52.How do the public feel about the current economic
situation? (2004)
(A) Optimistic.(B) Confused. (C) Carefree.(D)
Panicked.
【解析】:
第一步:根據(jù)局部對(duì)象或者局部對(duì)象的主體找出本題的出題句;我們發(fā)現(xiàn)本題根本就沒有對(duì)應(yīng)的出題句。因?yàn)槲恼轮袥]有the
public這個(gè)短語。在沒有一樣的詞語的時(shí)候我們應(yīng)該尋找一個(gè)近意詞來替代。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)在文章倒數(shù)第二段的第一句話中的Consumers即是指大眾,因此本句為出題句。
第二步:在出題句(或稱得分句)中尋找含有感情色彩的詞語或句子;在最后一段的第一句中我們找到了not
in despair這個(gè)詞組,是沒有絕望的意思;
第三步:比較該感情色彩的詞語或句子和四個(gè)選項(xiàng),選擇一個(gè)意思和該詞語最為接近的選項(xiàng);發(fā)現(xiàn)A是樂觀的意思,是四個(gè)選項(xiàng)中意思最為接近的選項(xiàng);
例4、Americans today don’t place a very high value on intellect. Our heroes are athletes, entertainers, and entrepreneurs, not scholars. Even our schools are where we send our children to get a practical education —— not to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge. Symptoms of pervasive anti-intellectualism in our schools aren’t difficult to find. “Schools have always been in a society where practical is more important than intellectual,” says education writer Diane Ravitch. “Schools could be a counterbalance.” Razitch’s latest bock, Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms, traces the roots of anti-intellectualism in our schools, concluding they are anything but a counterbalance to the American distaste for intellectual pursuits. But they could and should be. Encouraging kids to reject the life of the mind leaves them vulnerable to exploitation and control. Without the ability to think critically, to defend their ideas and understand the ideas of others, they cannot fully participate in our democracy. Continuing along this path, says writer Earl Shorris, “We will become a second-rate country. We will have a less civil society.” “Intellect is resented as a form of power or privilege,” writes historian and professor Richard Hofstadter in Anti-Intellectualism in American life, a Pulitzer Prize winning book on the roots of anti-intellectualism in US politics, religion, and education. From the beginning of our history, says Hofstadter, our democratic and populist urges have driven us to reject anything that smells of elitism. Practicality, common sense, and native intelligence have been considered more noble qualities than anything you could learn from a book. Ralph Waldo Emerson and other Transcendentalist philosophers thought schooling and rigorous book learning put unnatural restraints on children:“We are shut up in schools and college recitation rooms for 10 or 15 years and come out at last with a bellyful of words and do not know a thing.”Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn exemplified American anti-intellectualism. Its hero avoids being civilized —— going to school and learning to read —— so he can preserve his innate goodness. Intellect, according to Hofstadter, is different from native intelligence, a quality we reluctantly admire. Intellect is the critical, creative, and contemplative side of the mind. Intelligence seeks to grasp, manipulate, re-order, and adjust, while intellect examines, ponders, wonders, theorizes, criticizes and imagines. School remains a place where intellect is mistrusted. Hofstadter says our country’s educational system is in the grips of people who “joyfully and militantly proclaim their hostility to intellect and their eagerness to identify with children who show the least intellectual promise.”
58. The views of Ravish and Emerson on schooling
are(2004)
(A) identical. (B) similar. (C) complementary. (D)
opposite.
【解析】:
第一步:根據(jù)局部對(duì)象或者局部對(duì)象的主體找出本題的出題句;我們發(fā)現(xiàn)本題根本就沒有對(duì)應(yīng)的出題句。我們發(fā)現(xiàn)文章中沒有一句話是即包括Ravish有包括Emerson的,但是我們能很輕易的找到Ravish在第二段的第一句話中,Emerson在第五段的第一句話中,因此這個(gè)題目的得分句是這個(gè)兩句。
第二步:在出題句(或稱得分句)中尋找含有感情色彩的詞語或句子;我們發(fā)現(xiàn)這個(gè)兩句話的意思正好是相反的;
第三步:比較該感情色彩的詞語或句子和四個(gè)選項(xiàng),我們只能選擇D;另外因?yàn)檫@個(gè)題目中A、B、C的意思是相近的,所以同時(shí)排除,我們也可以知道這個(gè)題目選D。
考研名師:2006英語閱讀50天速成勝經(jīng)(二)