首頁 考試吧論壇 Exam8視線 考試商城 網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程 模擬考試 考友錄 實(shí)用文檔 求職招聘 論文下載
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培訓(xùn) | 在職研 | 自學(xué)考試 | 成人高考 | 法律碩士 | MBA考試
MPA考試 | 中科院
四六級 | 職稱英語 | 商務(wù)英語 | 公共英語 | 托福 | 雅思 | 專四專八 | 口譯筆譯 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英語 | 成人英語三級 | 申碩英語 | 攻碩英語 | 職稱日語 | 日語學(xué)習(xí) | 法語 | 德語 | 韓語
計(jì)算機(jī)等級考試 | 軟件水平考試 | 職稱計(jì)算機(jī) | 微軟認(rèn)證 | 思科認(rèn)證 | Oracle認(rèn)證 | Linux認(rèn)證
華為認(rèn)證 | Java認(rèn)證
公務(wù)員 | 報(bào)關(guān)員 | 銀行從業(yè)資格 | 證券從業(yè)資格 | 期貨從業(yè)資格 | 司法考試 | 法律顧問 | 導(dǎo)游資格
報(bào)檢員 | 教師資格 | 社會(huì)工作者 | 外銷員 | 國際商務(wù)師 | 跟單員 | 單證員 | 物流師 | 價(jià)格鑒證師
人力資源 | 管理咨詢師考試 | 秘書資格 | 心理咨詢師考試 | 出版專業(yè)資格 | 廣告師職業(yè)水平
駕駛員 | 網(wǎng)絡(luò)編輯
衛(wèi)生資格 | 執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)藥師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士
會(huì)計(jì)從業(yè)資格考試會(huì)計(jì)證) | 經(jīng)濟(jì)師 | 會(huì)計(jì)職稱 | 注冊會(huì)計(jì)師 | 審計(jì)師 | 注冊稅務(wù)師
注冊資產(chǎn)評估師 | 高級會(huì)計(jì)師 | ACCA | 統(tǒng)計(jì)師 | 精算師 | 理財(cái)規(guī)劃師 | 國際內(nèi)審師
一級建造師 | 二級建造師 | 造價(jià)工程師 | 造價(jià)員 | 咨詢工程師 | 監(jiān)理工程師 | 安全工程師
質(zhì)量工程師 | 物業(yè)管理師 | 招標(biāo)師 | 結(jié)構(gòu)工程師 | 建筑師 | 房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)師 | 土地估價(jià)師 | 巖土師
設(shè)備監(jiān)理師 | 房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人 | 投資項(xiàng)目管理師 | 土地登記代理人 | 環(huán)境影響評價(jià)師 | 環(huán)保工程師
城市規(guī)劃師 | 公路監(jiān)理師 | 公路造價(jià)師 | 安全評價(jià)師 | 電氣工程師 | 注冊測繪師 | 注冊計(jì)量師
繽紛校園 | 實(shí)用文檔 | 英語學(xué)習(xí) | 作文大全 | 求職招聘 | 論文下載 | 訪談 | 游戲
考研_考試吧考研_首發(fā)2011考研成績查詢
考研網(wǎng)校 模擬考場 考研資訊 復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo) 歷年真題 模擬試題 經(jīng)驗(yàn) 考研查分 考研復(fù)試 考研調(diào)劑 論壇 短信提醒
考研英語| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研政治| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研數(shù)學(xué)| 資料 真題 模擬題  專業(yè)課| 資料 真題 模擬題  在職研究生

考研英語歷年真題來源報(bào)刊閱讀100篇 Text 10

Can coal be clean? NO.10

Can coal be clean?

  Coal has several advantages as a fuel. It is abundant. It is widely distributed: countries that are short of other fossil fuels, such as Germany and South Africa, have mountains of it. As a result, it is cheap. Even though the price has risen in the past few years, it is still less expensive to run a power plant on coal than on almost anything else.

  But coal is also dirty. It releases lots of soot and various noxious chemicals as it burns, and so has fallen out of favour in many Western countries. Worse, coalfired plants produce roughly twice as much carbon dioxide per unit of electricity generated than those that run on natural gas.

  The obvious solution is to make coalfired generation cleaner. And that's what utilities in Western countries have been doing for years, to comply with ever stiffer airpollution standards. Reducing emissions of carbon dioxide, however, is another matter. In Britain, as in most rich countries, the average efficiency of coalfired power stations is about 35%. But Mitsui Babcock, an engineering firm, says its most recent designs can achieve efficiencies as high as 46%. It reckons that switching from an old design to a new one can cut fuel consumption and emissions by 23%.

  Many methods can reduce the various emissions produced by coalfired power stations, so that they are at least no worse than gasfired stations. But technologies also exist to make coal cleaner still, by filtering out carbon dioxide from the flue gas and storing it somehow. This is theoretically possible, but expensive. Moreover, unlike modifications that improve efficiency, there are no savings to be had by adding carboncapture technology to a power plant. As a result, no such plants have been built.

  How does carbon capture work? Most utilities are eyeing one of three basic designs. The simplest, and easiest to bolt on to existing plants, treats carbon dioxide like any other pollutant, and extracts it from the flue gas. Many firms already use this "amine scrubbing" approach to remove carbon dioxide from natural gas, for example. But it is not so practical for largescale uses, since the amines are expensive, as is heating them to release the captured carbon dioxide.

  "Oxy fuel" plants sidestep the difficulties of separating oxygen and nitrogen in the flue gas by burning coal in pure oxygen rather than air. The resulting flue gas is almost pure carbon dioxide. But the energy used to separate oxygen from air before burning is almost as great as that needed to filter out nitrogen afterwards, leading to a similar loss of efficiency.

  The third approach, called "integrated gasification combined cycle" (IGCC), also requires oxygen, but for use in a chemical reaction rather than for burning. When heated in oxygen, coal reacts to form carbon dioxide and hydrogen. An amine solution then absorbs the carbon dioxide, while the hydrogen is burnt in a modified furnace. The amine scrubbing is cheaper than usual, since the reaction generates carbon dioxide in a more concentrated form. Engineers are also experimenting with membranes that would allow hydrogen to pass, but not carbon dioxide. There are four IGCC demonstration plants operating in America and Europe, although none currently captures carbon dioxide permanently; instead, it is simply released into the atmosphere. AEP's planned new plants will follow a similar design.

  George Bush is a believer, at any rate. In 2003 he unveiled a subsidised scheme to build a zeroemissions IGCC plant called "Future Gen" by 2013. The European Union, for its part, is giving money to utilities dabbling in oxy fuel, among other schemes. Handouts from the taxpayer are needed, power firms argue, since the technology in question is still young. But it is hard to believe that it will ever grow up unless subsidies give way to stronger measures, such as longterm caps or taxes on carbondioxide emissions. The technology to eliminate such emissions from coalfired plants exists, but it will not be adopted without regulatory incentives from governments.

推薦:2009年考研英語閱讀理解精讀100篇(高分版)匯總

   支招:2009年考研英語三層遞進(jìn)攻克閱讀理解

   考研英語歷年真題來源報(bào)刊閱讀理解100篇匯總

1 2 3 4 下一頁
文章搜索
任汝芬老師
在線名師:任汝芬老師
   著名政治教育專家;研究生、博士生導(dǎo)師;中國國家人事人才培...[詳細(xì)]
考研欄目導(dǎo)航
版權(quán)聲明:如果考研網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會(huì)及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本考研網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請注明出處。