首頁 考試吧論壇 Exam8視線 考試商城 網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程 模擬考試 考友錄 實(shí)用文檔 求職招聘 論文下載
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培訓(xùn) | 在職研 | 自學(xué)考試 | 成人高考 | 法律碩士 | MBA考試
MPA考試 | 中科院
四六級(jí) | 職稱英語 | 商務(wù)英語 | 公共英語 | 托福 | 雅思 | 專四專八 | 口譯筆譯 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英語 | 成人英語三級(jí) | 申碩英語 | 攻碩英語 | 職稱日語 | 日語學(xué)習(xí) | 法語 | 德語 | 韓語
計(jì)算機(jī)等級(jí)考試 | 軟件水平考試 | 職稱計(jì)算機(jī) | 微軟認(rèn)證 | 思科認(rèn)證 | Oracle認(rèn)證 | Linux認(rèn)證
華為認(rèn)證 | Java認(rèn)證
公務(wù)員 | 報(bào)關(guān)員 | 銀行從業(yè)資格 | 證券從業(yè)資格 | 期貨從業(yè)資格 | 司法考試 | 法律顧問 | 導(dǎo)游資格
報(bào)檢員 | 教師資格 | 社會(huì)工作者 | 外銷員 | 國(guó)際商務(wù)師 | 跟單員 | 單證員 | 物流師 | 價(jià)格鑒證師
人力資源 | 管理咨詢師考試 | 秘書資格 | 心理咨詢師考試 | 出版專業(yè)資格 | 廣告師職業(yè)水平
駕駛員 | 網(wǎng)絡(luò)編輯
衛(wèi)生資格 | 執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)藥師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士
會(huì)計(jì)從業(yè)資格考試會(huì)計(jì)證) | 經(jīng)濟(jì)師 | 會(huì)計(jì)職稱 | 注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師 | 審計(jì)師 | 注冊(cè)稅務(wù)師
注冊(cè)資產(chǎn)評(píng)估師 | 高級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)師 | ACCA | 統(tǒng)計(jì)師 | 精算師 | 理財(cái)規(guī)劃師 | 國(guó)際內(nèi)審師
一級(jí)建造師 | 二級(jí)建造師 | 造價(jià)工程師 | 造價(jià)員 | 咨詢工程師 | 監(jiān)理工程師 | 安全工程師
質(zhì)量工程師 | 物業(yè)管理師 | 招標(biāo)師 | 結(jié)構(gòu)工程師 | 建筑師 | 房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)師 | 土地估價(jià)師 | 巖土師
設(shè)備監(jiān)理師 | 房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人 | 投資項(xiàng)目管理師 | 土地登記代理人 | 環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)師 | 環(huán)保工程師
城市規(guī)劃師 | 公路監(jiān)理師 | 公路造價(jià)師 | 安全評(píng)價(jià)師 | 電氣工程師 | 注冊(cè)測(cè)繪師 | 注冊(cè)計(jì)量師
繽紛校園 | 實(shí)用文檔 | 英語學(xué)習(xí) | 作文大全 | 求職招聘 | 論文下載 | 訪談 | 游戲
考研_考試吧考研_首發(fā)2011考研成績(jī)查詢
考研網(wǎng)校 模擬考場(chǎng) 考研資訊 復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo) 歷年真題 模擬試題 經(jīng)驗(yàn) 考研查分 考研復(fù)試 考研調(diào)劑 論壇 短信提醒
考研英語| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研政治| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研數(shù)學(xué)| 資料 真題 模擬題  專業(yè)課| 資料 真題 模擬題  在職研究生

考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘(27)

2005年Text 4

  American no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing. The Degradation of language and Music and why we should like, care, John McWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English.

  Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter's academic specialty is language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearance of "whom", for example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of the case-ending of Old English.

  But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.

  Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive-there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.

  Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reforms-he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English "on paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.

37. The word "talking" (Line6, paragraph3) denotes
[A] modesty.
[B] personality.
[C] liveliness.
[D] informality.

[答案] D

[解題思路]

  第三段最后一句話為"In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft"(無論是在口頭英語和書面語中,說話勝過了談話,自然發(fā)揮勝過了精雕細(xì)琢),此外該段第一句話中提到了the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music(已經(jīng)宣布了正式演講、寫作、詩歌和經(jīng)典音樂的滅亡),因此可以推斷talking 代表的就是informal及非正式的形式,也就是D選項(xiàng)。

[題目譯文]

"talking"(第三段第五行)這個(gè)詞代表          
[A] 謙虛
[B] 個(gè)性
[C] 生動(dòng)
[D] 非正式

 

上一頁  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 下一頁
文章搜索
任汝芬老師
在線名師:任汝芬老師
   著名政治教育專家;研究生、博士生導(dǎo)師;中國(guó)國(guó)家人事人才培...[詳細(xì)]
考研欄目導(dǎo)航
版權(quán)聲明:如果考研網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會(huì)及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本考研網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)注明出處。