首頁(yè) 考試吧論壇 Exam8視線 考試商城 網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程 模擬考試 考友錄 實(shí)用文檔 求職招聘 論文下載
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培訓(xùn) | 在職研 | 自學(xué)考試 | 成人高考 | 法律碩士 | MBA考試
MPA考試 | 中科院
四六級(jí) | 職稱英語 | 商務(wù)英語 | 公共英語 | 托福 | 雅思 | 專四專八 | 口譯筆譯 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英語 | 成人英語三級(jí) | 申碩英語 | 攻碩英語 | 職稱日語 | 日語學(xué)習(xí) | 法語 | 德語 | 韓語
計(jì)算機(jī)等級(jí)考試 | 軟件水平考試 | 職稱計(jì)算機(jī) | 微軟認(rèn)證 | 思科認(rèn)證 | Oracle認(rèn)證 | Linux認(rèn)證
華為認(rèn)證 | Java認(rèn)證
公務(wù)員 | 報(bào)關(guān)員 | 銀行從業(yè)資格 | 證券從業(yè)資格 | 期貨從業(yè)資格 | 司法考試 | 法律顧問 | 導(dǎo)游資格
報(bào)檢員 | 教師資格 | 社會(huì)工作者 | 外銷員 | 國(guó)際商務(wù)師 | 跟單員 | 單證員 | 物流師 | 價(jià)格鑒證師
人力資源 | 管理咨詢師考試 | 秘書資格 | 心理咨詢師考試 | 出版專業(yè)資格 | 廣告師職業(yè)水平
駕駛員 | 網(wǎng)絡(luò)編輯
衛(wèi)生資格 | 執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)藥師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士
會(huì)計(jì)從業(yè)資格考試會(huì)計(jì)證) | 經(jīng)濟(jì)師 | 會(huì)計(jì)職稱 | 注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師 | 審計(jì)師 | 注冊(cè)稅務(wù)師
注冊(cè)資產(chǎn)評(píng)估師 | 高級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)師 | ACCA | 統(tǒng)計(jì)師 | 精算師 | 理財(cái)規(guī)劃師 | 國(guó)際內(nèi)審師
一級(jí)建造師 | 二級(jí)建造師 | 造價(jià)工程師 | 造價(jià)員 | 咨詢工程師 | 監(jiān)理工程師 | 安全工程師
質(zhì)量工程師 | 物業(yè)管理師 | 招標(biāo)師 | 結(jié)構(gòu)工程師 | 建筑師 | 房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)師 | 土地估價(jià)師 | 巖土師
設(shè)備監(jiān)理師 | 房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人 | 投資項(xiàng)目管理師 | 土地登記代理人 | 環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)師 | 環(huán)保工程師
城市規(guī)劃師 | 公路監(jiān)理師 | 公路造價(jià)師 | 安全評(píng)價(jià)師 | 電氣工程師 | 注冊(cè)測(cè)繪師 | 注冊(cè)計(jì)量師
繽紛校園 | 實(shí)用文檔 | 英語學(xué)習(xí) | 作文大全 | 求職招聘 | 論文下載 | 訪談 | 游戲
考研_考試吧考研_首發(fā)2011考研成績(jī)查詢
考研網(wǎng)校 模擬考場(chǎng) 考研資訊 復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo) 歷年真題 模擬試題 經(jīng)驗(yàn) 考研查分 考研復(fù)試 考研調(diào)劑 論壇 短信提醒
考研英語| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研政治| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研數(shù)學(xué)| 資料 真題 模擬題  專業(yè)課| 資料 真題 模擬題  在職研究生

考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘(37)

  2007年Text 2

  For the past several years, the Sunday newspaper supplement Parade has featured a column called "Ask Marilyn." People are invited to query Marilyn vos Savant, who at age 10 had tested at a mental level of someone about 23 years old; that gave her an IQ of 228 -- the highest score ever recorded. IQ tests ask you to complete verbal and visual analogies, to envision paper after it has been folded and cut, and to deduce numerical sequences, among other similar tasks. So it is a bit confusing when vos Savant fields such queries from the average Joe (whose IQ is 100) as, What's the difference between love and fondness? Or what is the nature of luck and coincidence? It's not obvious how the capacity to visualize objects and to figure out numerical patterns suits one to answer questions that have eluded some of the best poets and philosophers.

  Clearly, intelligence encompasses more than a score on a test. Just what does it mean to be smart? How much of intelligence can be specified, and how much can we learn about it from neurology, genetics, computer science and other fields?

  The defining term of intelligence in humans still seems to be the IQ score, even though IQ tests are not given as often as they used to be. The test comes primarily in two forms: the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler intelligence Scales (both come in adult and children's version). Generally costing several hundred dollars, they are usually given only by psychologists, although variations of them populate bookstores and the World Wide Web. Superhigh scores like vos Savant's are no longer possible, because scoring is now based on a statistical population distribution among age peers, rather than simply dividing the mental age by the chronological age and multiplying by 100. Other standardized tests, such as the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and the Graduate Record Exam (GRE), capture the main aspects of IQ tests.

  Such standardized tests may not assess all the important elements necessary to succeed in school and in life, argues Robert J. Sternberg. In his article "How Intelligent Is Intelligence Testing?", Sternberg notes that traditional tests best assess analytical and verbal skills but fail to measure creativity and practical knowledge, components also critical to problem solving and life success. Moreover, IQ tests do not necessarily predict so well once populations or situations change. Research has found that IQ predicted leadership skills when the tests were given under low-stress conditions, but under high-stress conditions, IQ was negatively correlated with leadership -- that is, it predicted the opposite. Anyone who has toiled through SAT will testify that test-taking skill also matters, whether it's knowing when to guess or what questions to skip.

  26. Which of the following may be required in an intelligence test?

  [A] Answering philosophical questions.

  [B] Folding or cutting paper into different shapes.

  [C] Telling the differences between certain concepts.

  [D] Choosing words or graphs similar to the given ones.

  [答案] D

  [解題思路]

  本題對(duì)應(yīng)于文章第一段的第三句話"IQ tests ask you to complete verbal and visual analogies, to envision paper after it has been folded and cut, and to deduce numerical sequences, among other similar tasks"(智商測(cè)試要求你完成一些文字和圖像的分析,要求你在紙張被折疊和剪切后想象它的形狀,要求你推論數(shù)字的順序,還有其他類似的項(xiàng)目),顯然A和C選項(xiàng)的內(nèi)容不包括其中,因而是錯(cuò)誤選項(xiàng)。B選項(xiàng)的表述與原文"to envision paper after it has been folded and cut"意思相左,也可排除。D選項(xiàng)對(duì)應(yīng)于"to complete verbal and visual analogies",因而是正確答案。

  [題目譯文]

  下列的哪一項(xiàng)在智商測(cè)試中有所要求?

  [A] 回答哲學(xué)問題

  [B] 把紙折成或剪成不同的形狀

  [C] 區(qū)別一些概念之間不同

  [D] 根據(jù)給定的詞匯或者圖像選擇相似的詞匯或圖像。

  28. People nowadays can no longer achieve IQ scores as high as vos Savant's because

  [A] the scores are obtained through different computational procedures.

  [B] creativity rather than analytical skills is emphasized now.

  [C] vos Savant's case is an extreme one that will not repeat.

  [D] the defining characteristic of IQ tests has changed.

  [答案] A

  [解題思路]

  本題的對(duì)應(yīng)信息在文章第二段的第四句話"Superhigh scores like vos Savant's are no longer possible, because scoring is now based on a statistical population distribution among age peers, rather than simply dividing the mental age by the chronological age and multiplying by 100"( 像沃斯•薩文特那么高的分?jǐn)?shù)也再也不可能出現(xiàn)了,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在的分?jǐn)?shù)依據(jù)的是相同年齡者的統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)群體分布狀況,而不是簡(jiǎn)單地通過實(shí)際年齡乘以100來劃分智能年齡),顯而易見主要是因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在的計(jì)算方法不同,答案為A選項(xiàng)。B和D選項(xiàng)的表述與原文相反,而C選項(xiàng)則屬于無中生有,與原文無關(guān)。

  [題目譯文]

  現(xiàn)在的人們不再可能取得沃斯•薩文特那么高的智商分?jǐn)?shù)是因?yàn)?/P>

  [A] 現(xiàn)在使用不同的計(jì)算程序計(jì)分

  [B] 現(xiàn)在更加強(qiáng)調(diào)創(chuàng)造力而不是分析能力

  [C] 沃斯•薩文特的例子只是一個(gè)不會(huì)再出現(xiàn)的極端情況

  [D] 智商測(cè)試的定義性特征發(fā)生了變化

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 下一頁(yè)
  相關(guān)推薦:考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘
       2009年考研英語歷年真題閱讀理解精讀筆記匯總
文章搜索
任汝芬老師
在線名師:任汝芬老師
   著名政治教育專家;研究生、博士生導(dǎo)師;中國(guó)國(guó)家人事人才培...[詳細(xì)]
考研欄目導(dǎo)航
版權(quán)聲明:如果考研網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會(huì)及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本考研網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)注明出處。