08年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀100篇【法律類】

考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀100篇unit67
Unit 67
Walter Milancuk's public-school horror story began early, when his son Derrick spent kindergarten in an overcrowded roomful of students who regularly fought in class and cursed the teacher. Milancuk wanted to transfer Derrick, but his salary as a forklift driver couldn't cover private-school tuition. Yet Milancuk found a way out, thanks to Cleveland's pioneering school-voucher program, which granted him close to $1,500 in state funds to help enroll Derrick at St. Stanislaus, a nearby Catholic school. Now Derrick wears a crisp uniform. His reading has improved. And the weekly Mass and Bible study have moved Derrick to say his daily prayers without prompting. Says his dad, "The school is really building his faith."
 
That may prove to be more of a curse than a blessing. Last week a federal judge struck down Cleveland's voucher program, ruling that it violates the constitutional separation of church and state. Citing Jefferson and Madison, Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. wrote that because four-fifths of the private schools participating in the voucher program are religious, the program robs parents of "genuine choice" between sectarian and secular schools, thus "advancing religion through government-supported religious indoctrination." The decision is the fourth in recent months to bar the use of vouchers in parochial schools, and voucher opponents--mainly teachers' unions and liberal interest groups--see it as a major victory.
 
Voucher backers--an unusual coalition of inner-city parents and conservative groups--retort that the judge misread both the Cleveland program and the First Amendment. They point out that Cleveland parents who don't like parochial schools can send their kids to the city's regular public schools, or to public charter schools and magnet schools. Clint Bolick, a lawyer for the Institute for Justice, which defended the voucher program, says, "No one can compel a child into the program or into a religious school."
 
Despite its recent setbacks, the voucher movement is gaining ground in state legislatures and some state courts. This fall Florida started the first statewide voucher program. And the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the use of vouchers in parochial schools in Milwaukee. In the presidential campaign, G.O.P. candidates John McCain and George W. Bush are trumpeting voucher proposals. While Vice President Al Gore launched an ad that calls vouchers a "big mistake," his Democratic opponent Bill Bradley supports them, at least as "experiments."
 
Though the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear several school-choice cases, legal experts suspect the more clear-cut Cleveland case might prod it into action. In the meantime, Judge Oliver is allowing Derrick Milancuk and nearly 4,000 other students in the Cleveland voucher program to remain in their schools while his ruling is on appeal.
 
注（1）：本文選自By Jodie Morse  Time; 12/31/99, Vol. 154 Issue 27, p220, 2/3p, 1c
注（2）：本文習(xí)題命題模仿對(duì)象2004年真題text 2
 
1.What does the author intend to illustrate with Derrick’s change of performance in different schools?
 
[A] the role voucher program plays in helping children get better education
[B] the change a parochial school can bring to a child
[C] the poor education quality of public schools
[D] the importance of enrolling kids of poor performance in private schools
 
2.What can we infer from the second paragraph?
 
[A] Parents do not have a choice when they send their children to religious schools.
[B]. The judge’s ruling is helpful in building better public schools.
[C] Teaching religious stuff in schools is a violation of the Constitution.
[D] Teachers of public schools do not welcome the idea of voucher program.
 
3.What does “advance religion through government-supported religious indoctrination” (Line 5, Paragraph 2) mean?
 
[A] promote religious ideas in public schools with government support
[B] collect government resources to support religious activities
[C] help religious schools use public fund to spread religious ideas
[D] allow religion to interfere with government work
 
4.        The 4th paragraph suggests that _________________.
 
[A] Judge Oliver’s ruling has caused political debate between the Republicans and the Democrats. 
[B] George W. Bush is in favor of voucher program.
[C] Voucher program does more good than harm.
[D] Democrats have a low opinion of voucher program.
 
5.        Which of the following is true according to the text?
 
[A] The author thinks that voucher program is more of a curse than a blessing.
[B] The U.S Supreme Court will not support voucher program.
[C] Parents will have no choice but send their children to religious schools if they join in the voucher program.
[D] Voucher program is still a controversial issue in legal and political areas.
 
答案：ADCBD
 
篇章剖析
本篇文章以具體事例為引子，采用對(duì)比分析的方法，就教育券計(jì)劃在美國(guó)所產(chǎn)生的廣泛影響進(jìn)行分析。在第一段以一個(gè)具體事例說(shuō)明教育券計(jì)劃給米蘭卡克的兒子德里克帶來(lái)的變化，接著在第二段說(shuō)明教育券計(jì)劃引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)論和司法訴訟，在第三段提出支持者的意見(jiàn)，第四段和第五段說(shuō)明教育券計(jì)劃正逐漸贏得司法的支持。
 
詞匯注釋
voucher []n. 代金券；教育券
flunk []v. (使)失敗
parochial [] adj. 教區(qū)的
stall []v. (使)停轉(zhuǎn), (使)停止, 遲延
forklift [] n. <美>[機(jī)]鏟車,叉式升降機(jī)
Mass [] n. （天主教的）彌撒
crisp [] adj. 嶄新的；明顯干凈的或新的：
sectarian [] adj. 宗派的；教派的
secular []adj. 非宗教的，世俗的
indoctrination [] n. 教導(dǎo), 教化
Amendment []n. 修正案
charter school: 特許學(xué)校 （[美國(guó)]不受地方教育主管機(jī)構(gòu)管理，具有不同于其他學(xué)校的課程設(shè)置和教育理念的公立學(xué)校）
magnet school: 英才學(xué)校 （提供專業(yè)課程，具有較高學(xué)術(shù)水準(zhǔn)的公立學(xué)校）
prod [  ] v. 督促；推動(dòng)
appeal []n. 上訴
 
難句突破
1.Citing Jefferson and Madison, Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. wrote that because four-fifths of the private schools participating in the voucher program are religious, the program robs parents of "genuine choice" between sectarian and secular schools, thus "advancing religion through government-supported religious indoctrination."
主體句式：Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. wrote that…
結(jié)構(gòu)分析：這個(gè)句子是個(gè)復(fù)雜句，citing是現(xiàn)在分詞做方式狀語(yǔ)，在wrote后面由that引導(dǎo)的賓語(yǔ)從句又是一個(gè)復(fù)雜結(jié)構(gòu)，包含了because引導(dǎo)的原因狀語(yǔ)從句，還有advancing這個(gè)現(xiàn)在分詞引導(dǎo)的結(jié)果狀語(yǔ)。理解這樣的復(fù)雜長(zhǎng)句時(shí)，應(yīng)該先確定句子的主語(yǔ)和謂語(yǔ)，再確定其他句子成分。
句子譯文：所羅門(mén)•奧利弗法官引用杰斐遜和麥迪遜的話寫(xiě)道，因?yàn)閰⑴c教育券計(jì)劃的學(xué)校中有五分之四是宗教學(xué)校，這一計(jì)劃實(shí)際上剝奪了家長(zhǎng)在世俗學(xué)校和宗教學(xué)校之間做出“真正選擇”的機(jī)會(huì)，繼而“通過(guò)政府支持的宗教教育擴(kuò)大宗教影響”。
 
題目分析
1．  答案是A，屬推理判斷題。 文中先說(shuō)Derrick在公立學(xué)校的糟糕表現(xiàn)，再說(shuō)在教區(qū)學(xué)校所取得的進(jìn)步，作者用“Yet Milancuk found a way out, thanks to Cleveland's pioneering school-voucher program”來(lái)說(shuō)明Derrick的前后變化歸功于教育券計(jì)劃的實(shí)施，并為下文討論教育券計(jì)劃做好了鋪墊。
2． 答案是D，屬推理判斷題。從第二段最后一行“voucher opponents--mainly teachers' unions and liberal interest groups--see it as a major victory”可以看出教師們對(duì)教育券計(jì)劃持反對(duì)態(tài)度。
3． 答案是C，屬猜詞題。文中第二段法官裁定克利夫蘭教育券計(jì)劃違背了憲法政教分離的原則，也就是說(shuō)政府資金不應(yīng)該用于資助教授宗教內(nèi)容的宗教學(xué)校。由此可見(jiàn)如果允許在宗教學(xué)校中使用教育券，就會(huì)導(dǎo)致公共資金被用于宗教傳播活動(dòng)。
4． 答案是B，屬事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。文中第四段第四行提到“George W. Bush are trumpeting voucher proposals.”trumpet意為“鼓吹，宣傳”。
5． 答案是D， 屬推理判斷題。從全文列舉的材料來(lái)看，有裁定教育券計(jì)劃違憲的例子（第二段），也有說(shuō)明許多州立法機(jī)關(guān)和法院支持教育券計(jì)劃的例子（第四段）；有支持著的意見(jiàn)，也有反對(duì)者的意見(jiàn)，但并沒(méi)有最終的定論。由此可見(jiàn)，教育券計(jì)劃仍然備受爭(zhēng)議。
 
參考譯文:
法官裁定克利夫蘭將教育券用于教區(qū)學(xué)校的做法違法。但這一裁定會(huì)妨礙教育券運(yùn)動(dòng)嗎？
 
沃特•米蘭卡克在公立學(xué)校的不快經(jīng)歷早在兒子德里克上幼兒園的時(shí)候就開(kāi)始了。當(dāng)時(shí)德里克所在的幼兒園人滿為患，學(xué)生們上課經(jīng)常打架，罵老師。米蘭卡克想讓德里克轉(zhuǎn)學(xué)，但他做叉車司機(jī)的收入支付不了私立學(xué)校的學(xué)費(fèi)。好在米蘭卡克終于找到了一個(gè)辦法，這還要?dú)w功于克利夫蘭首創(chuàng)的學(xué)校教育券計(jì)劃。這一計(jì)劃撥給他將近1500美元的州基金幫他讓德里克在附近的圣•斯坦尼斯洛斯天主教學(xué)校注冊(cè)上學(xué)�，F(xiàn)在德里克穿著嶄新的校服。他的閱讀能力已經(jīng)有所提高。每周做彌撒和學(xué)習(xí)圣經(jīng)也使德里克受到熏陶，現(xiàn)在他不用人催就會(huì)每天做禱告。他爸爸說(shuō)：“這所學(xué)校真的在培養(yǎng)他的信念。”
 
可是，這與其說(shuō)是件好事，不如說(shuō)是件壞事。上周一位聯(lián)邦法官裁定該計(jì)劃違背了憲法政教分離的原則，這給克利夫蘭的教育券計(jì)劃帶來(lái)了沉重打擊。所羅門(mén)•奧利弗法官引用杰斐遜和麥迪遜的話寫(xiě)道，因?yàn)閰⑴c教育券計(jì)劃的學(xué)校中有五分之四是宗教學(xué)校，這一計(jì)劃實(shí)際上剝奪了家長(zhǎng)在世俗學(xué)校和宗教學(xué)校之間做出“真正選擇”的機(jī)會(huì)，繼而“通過(guò)政府支持的宗教教育擴(kuò)大宗教影響”。這一裁決是最近幾個(gè)月來(lái)第四起禁止在教區(qū)學(xué)校使用教育券的裁決，而反對(duì)教育券的人---主要是教師工會(huì)和自由主義利益團(tuán)體---則把它視為一場(chǎng)重大勝利。
 
支持教育券的人---由內(nèi)城區(qū)的家長(zhǎng)和保守團(tuán)體形成的一支不同尋常的聯(lián)合陣線---反駁認(rèn)為這位法官既不理解克利夫蘭計(jì)劃，也沒(méi)有領(lǐng)會(huì)“憲法第一修正案”的真正含義。他們指出，那些不喜歡交換學(xué)校的克利夫蘭家長(zhǎng)可以把他們的孩子送到城里的正規(guī)公立學(xué)校，或者特許公立學(xué)校和英才學(xué)校（magnet school）。司法學(xué)院的律師克林特•伯里克曾為教育券計(jì)劃辯護(hù)，他說(shuō)：“沒(méi)有人能迫使一個(gè)孩子參與一個(gè)項(xiàng)目，或者進(jìn)入一所宗教學(xué)校�！�
 
雖然最近遭遇了挫折，但教育券運(yùn)動(dòng)正在各州立法機(jī)構(gòu)和一些州法院贏得支持。今年秋季，佛羅里達(dá)開(kāi)始了第一項(xiàng)全州教育券計(jì)劃。威斯康星最高法院也贊同密爾沃基教區(qū)學(xué)校使用教育券。在總統(tǒng)選舉中，共和黨候選人約翰•麥凱恩和喬治•W•布什都積極支持教育券計(jì)劃。雖然副總統(tǒng)艾爾•戈?duì)栐谝粍t廣告中宣稱教育券是“一個(gè)嚴(yán)重錯(cuò)誤”，其民主黨內(nèi)的對(duì)手比爾•布萊德里卻對(duì)它們持支持態(tài)度，至少把它們當(dāng)作“實(shí)驗(yàn)”。
 
盡管美國(guó)最高法院拒絕審理幾起選校案件，法律專家懷疑案情清楚的克利夫蘭教育券案也許會(huì)促使高院行動(dòng)起來(lái)。與此同時(shí)，奧利弗法官同意在他的裁決被上訴期間讓德里克•米蘭卡克和近4000名參與克利夫蘭教育券計(jì)劃的其他學(xué)生繼續(xù)留在他們所在的學(xué)校里。

二：資料下載

三：推薦資料：

更多資料請(qǐng)?jiān)L問(wèn)：考試吧考研欄目