首頁 - 網(wǎng)校 - 萬題庫 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 導(dǎo)航
您現(xiàn)在的位置: 考試吧 > 自學(xué)考試 > 復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo) > 英語(二) > 正文

2018年10月自考英語(二)閱讀強(qiáng)化輔導(dǎo)(4)

來源:考試吧 2018-5-3 9:00:00 要考試,上考試吧! 自考萬題庫
考試吧整理“2018年10月自考英語(二)閱讀強(qiáng)化輔導(dǎo)(4)”,更多2018年自考復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo),請(qǐng)及時(shí)關(guān)注考試吧自考網(wǎng)或微信搜索公眾號(hào)“萬題庫自考”獲!

掃描/長(zhǎng)按下面二維碼
獲取自考備考指導(dǎo)

掃描/長(zhǎng)按下面二維碼
免費(fèi)做題、免費(fèi)學(xué)直播課

  點(diǎn)擊查看:2018年10月自考英語(二)閱讀強(qiáng)化輔導(dǎo)匯總

  Advantage Unfair

  According to the writer Walter Ellis, author of a book called the Oxbridge Conspiracy, Britain is still dominated by the old-boy network: it isn't what you know that matters, but who you know. He claims that at Oxford and Cambridge Universities (Oxbridge for short) a few select people start on an escalator ride which, over the years, carries them to the tops of British privilege and power. His research revealed that the top professions all continue to be dominated, if not 90 per cent, then 60 or 65 per cent, by Oxbridge graduates.

  And yet ,says Ellis, Oxbridge graduates make up only two per cent of the total number of students who graduate from Britain's universities. Other researches also seem to support his belief that Oxbridge graduates start with an unfair advantage in the employment market. In the law, a recently published report showed that out of 26 senior judges appointed to the High Court last year, all of them went to private schools and 21 of them went to Oxbridge.

  But can this be said to amount to a conspiracy? Not according to Dr. John Rae, a former headmaster of one of Britain's leading private schools, Westminster:"I would accept that there was a bias in some key areas of British life, but that bias has now gone. Some time ago - in the 60s and before - entry to Oxford and Cambridge was not entirely on merit. Now, there's absolutely no question in any objective observer's mind that entry to Oxford and Cambridge is fiercely competitive."However, many would disagree with this. For, although over three-quarters of British pupils are educated in state schools, over half the students that go to Oxbridge have been to private, or "public" schools. Is this because pupils from Britain's private schools are more intelligent than those from state schools, or are they simply better prepared?

  On average, about £5,000 a year is spent on each private school pupil, more than twice the amount spent on state school pupils. So how can the state schools be expected to compete with the private schools when they have far fewer resources? And how can they prepare their pupils for the special entrance exam to Oxford University, which requires extra preparation, and for which many public school pupils traditionally stay at school and do an additional term?

  Until recently, many blamed Oxford for this bias because of the university's special entrance exam (Cambridge abolished its entrance exam in 1986). But last February, Oxford University decided to abolish the exam to encourage more state school applicants. From autumn 1996, Oxford University applicants, like applicants to other universities, will be judged only on their A level results and on their performance at interviews, although some departments might still set special tests.

  However, some argue that there's nothing wrong in having elite places of learning, and that by their very nature, these places should not be easily accessible. Most countries are run by an elite and have centres of academic excellence from which the elite are recruited.

  Walter Ellis accepts that this is true:"But in France, for example, there are something like 40 equivalents of university, which provide this elite through a much broader base. In America you've got the Ivy League, centred on Harvard and Yale, with Princeton and Stanford and others. But again, those universities together - the elite universities - are about ten or fifteen in number, and are being pushed along from behind by other great universities like, for example, Chicago and Berkeley. So you don't have just this narrow concentration of two universities providing a constantly replicating elite."

  When it comes to Oxford and Cambridge being elitist because of the number of private school pupils they accept, Professor Stone of Oxford University argues that there is a simple fact he and his associates cannot ignore:"If certain schools do better than others then we just have to accept it. We cannot be a place for remedial education. It's not what Oxford is there to do."

  However, since academic excellence does appear to be related to the amount of money spent per pupil. This does seem to imply that Prime Minister John Major's vision of Britain as a classless society is still a long way off. And it may be worth remembering that while John Major didn't himself go to Oxbridge, most of his ministers did.

掃描/長(zhǎng)按二維碼即可幫助自考通關(guān)
獲取2018自考報(bào)名時(shí)間
獲取最后6套預(yù)測(cè)卷
免費(fèi)獲取8次直播課程
獲取歷年考試真題試卷

自考萬題庫下載微信搜索"萬題庫自考"

 

1 2 3 下一頁

  相關(guān)推薦:

  2018年自學(xué)考試《英語(二)》閱讀理解綜合輔導(dǎo)匯總

  2018年自學(xué)考試《英語(二)》大綱詞匯表匯總

  自考手機(jī)題庫上線 名師視頻解析 立即下載體驗(yàn)!

  關(guān)注萬題庫自考微信 第一時(shí)間獲取2018年自考報(bào)名!

文章搜索
萬題庫小程序
萬題庫小程序
·章節(jié)視頻 ·章節(jié)練習(xí)
·免費(fèi)真題 ·?荚囶}
微信掃碼,立即獲!
掃碼免費(fèi)使用
大學(xué)語文
共計(jì)461課時(shí)
講義已上傳
18020人在學(xué)
管理系統(tǒng)中計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用
共計(jì)21課時(shí)
講義已上傳
7218人在學(xué)
政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(財(cái)經(jīng)類)
共計(jì)738課時(shí)
講義已上傳
87485人在學(xué)
經(jīng)濟(jì)法概論(財(cái)經(jīng)類)
共計(jì)21課時(shí)
講義已上傳
989人在學(xué)
毛概
共計(jì)269課時(shí)
講義已上傳
16493人在學(xué)
推薦使用萬題庫APP學(xué)習(xí)
掃一掃,下載萬題庫
手機(jī)學(xué)習(xí),復(fù)習(xí)效率提升50%!
版權(quán)聲明:如果自學(xué)考試網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會(huì)及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本自學(xué)考試網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)注明出處。
官方
微信
掃描關(guān)注自考微信
領(lǐng)《大數(shù)據(jù)寶典》
報(bào)名
查分
掃描二維碼
關(guān)注自考報(bào)名查分
看直播 下載
APP
下載萬題庫
領(lǐng)精選6套卷
萬題庫
微信小程序
幫助
中心
文章責(zé)編:zhaorong