| 第 1 頁：試題 |
| 第 4 頁：答案解析 |
13.【答案】 The action of Xinghao Company is illegal.According to the provision of Contract Law，the party required to perform first may suspend its performance if it has conclusive evidence showing that the other party has engaged in transferring assets or evading debts.In this case， Xinghao Company is only doubtful about the situation that A Company evades the debt but it does not have conclusive evidence，SO Xinghao Company cannot exercise unsafe right of defense. 【附中文翻譯】興浩公司的行為不合法。根據(jù)《合同法》的規(guī)定，應(yīng)當(dāng)先履行債務(wù)的當(dāng)事 人，有確切證據(jù)證明對方有轉(zhuǎn)移財(cái)產(chǎn)、逃避債務(wù)的情形，可以中止履行合同。本案例中， 興浩公司僅僅是聽說A公司有逃避債務(wù)的情形，而沒有“確切證據(jù)”證明，此時(shí)不能行 使不安抗辯權(quán)。
【附題干翻譯】根據(jù)資料(六)，興浩公司8月20日中止履行合同的行為是否合法?簡要 分析理由。
14.【答案】 A Company should not require trading company to FetalTl the goods.According to the provision of Sa/es Contract Explanation，if the sales contract is valid and all buyers reauire actually performing the contract，if the buyer who firstly accepts goods requires confirming that the ownership has been transferred，the People’S Court should support.In this case.As Xinghao Company has delivered 30 pieces ofprecise instruments to the Trading Companv.The Trading Company can require confirming the ownership but A Company cannot require Trading Company to Tetulll.
【附中文翻譯】A公司不得要求貿(mào)易公司返還該批貨物。根據(jù)《買賣合同解釋》的規(guī)定， 在買賣合同均有效的情況下，買受人均要求實(shí)際履行合同的，先行受領(lǐng)交付的買受人請 求確認(rèn)所有權(quán)已經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)移的，人民法院應(yīng)予支持。本題中，由于興浩公司已經(jīng)將30臺(tái)精密 儀器交付了貿(mào)易公司，貿(mào)易公司可以請求確認(rèn)所有權(quán)，A公司不能要求貿(mào)易公司返還。
【附題干翻譯】根據(jù)資料(六)，A公司是否可以要求貿(mào)易公司返還該批貨物?簡要分析 理由。
15.【答案】 A Company may require Xinghao Company to assume the liability for breach of contract. According to the regulation，if the party who claims to exercise unsafe right of defense does not have conclusive evidence to prove that the performance is suspended，he should assume the liability for breach of contract.In this case，Xinghao Company wrongly exercises unsafe right of defense and signs multiple sales contracts，which leads to that the contract signed with A Company cannot being performed and he should assume liability for breach of contract to A Company.
【附中文翻譯】A公司可以要求興浩公司承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任。根據(jù)規(guī)定，主張不安抗辯權(quán)的當(dāng) 事人如果沒有確切證據(jù)證明中止履行的，應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任。本案例中，興浩公司不正 當(dāng)?shù)男惺共话部罐q權(quán)和簽訂多重買賣合同，致使與A公司簽訂的合同無法履行，應(yīng)當(dāng)向 A公司承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任。
【附題千翻譯】根據(jù)資料(六)，請說明A公司可否要求興浩公司承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任?簡要分 析理由。
相關(guān)推薦：
2014年注冊會(huì)計(jì)師考試大綱+變化+解讀(各科目)
下載
